Faktor Penarik dan Pendorong Deforestasi Hutan di Kabupaten Dharmasraya, Sumatra Barat

Abdul Mutolib; Yonariza; Ali Rahmat

doi:10.23960/jtur.vol1no1.2019.20

Abdul Mutolib Jurusan Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, 35141
Yonariza Jurusan Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Andalas, Padang, 25163
Ali Rahmat Jurusan Ilmu Tanah, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, 35141

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/jtur.vol1no1.2019.20

Keywords: KPHP Dharmasraya, Faktor penarik, Faktor pendorong, deforestasi, perkebunan

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi faktor penarik dan pendorong deforestasi hutan di wilayah Kerja Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan Produksi (KPHP) Dharmasraya. Penelitian dilaksanakan pada Januari hingga Juli 2017. Lokasi penelitian berada di KPHP Dharmasraya, Sumatera Barat. Secara administrasi KPHP Dharmasraya terletak di Kecamatan Pulau Punjung dan Koto Besar, Kabupaten Dhamasraya, Provinsi Sumatera Barat. KPHP Dharmasraya memiliki wilayah kerja dengan luas sekitar 33.550 ha. Kawasan KPHP Dharmasraya merupakan hutan sekunder yang wilayahnya berbatasan dengan kawasan pemukiman penduduk. Pengumpulan data mengkombinasikan beberapa teknik pengumpulan data seperti wawancara key informant, observasi lapangan/transek, homestay di dalam hutan dan analisis data sekunder. Jumlah informan kunci yang diwawancarai sebanyak 34 informan. Metode penelitian menggunakan menggunakan pendekatan penelitian kualitatif. Faktor penarik deforestasi hutan di KPHP Dharmasraya meliputIsifat ekonomi dan institusi sumberdaya hutan, serta mudahnya akses dan topografi hutan yang landai. Faktor pendorong masyarakat melakukan penebangan hutan meliputi adalah kebutuhan ekonomi/lapangan kerja melalui pembukaan hutan untuk lahan perkebunan dan sumber pendapatan, pembukaan untuk menandai hak milik, serta Setelah hutan ditebang kemudian ditinggalkan, dan faktor lainnya adalah tingginya kebutuhan kayu dan nilai (harga) kayu sehingga masyarakat menebang kayu (illegal logging) di dalam hutan yang pada akhirnya menyebabkan deforestasi hutan.

References

[1] J. K. Vanclay, “Deforestation: correlations, possible causes and some implications,” Int. For. Rev., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 278–293, 2005.
[2] Z. Ting, C. Haiyun, G. P. Shivakoti, R. Cochard, and K. Homcha-aim, “Revisit to community forest in northeast of Thailand: Changes in status and utilization,” Environ. Dev. Sustain., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 385–402, 2011.
[3] E. L. Dalla-Nora, A. P. D. de Aguiar, D. M. Lapola, and G. Woltjer, “Why have land use change models for the Amazon failed to capture the amount of deforestation over the last decade?,” Land use policy, vol. 39, pp. 403–411, 2014.
[4] L. E. O. . Aragao et al., “Interactions between rainfall, deforestation and fires during recent years in the Brazilian Amazonia,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., vol. 363, no. 1498, pp. 1779–1785, 2008.
[5] B. A. Margono, P. V Potapov, S. Turubanova, F. Stolle, and M. C. Hansen, “Primary forest cover loss in Indonesia over 2000–2012,” Nat. Clim. Chang., vol. 4, no. June, pp. 1–6, 2014.
[6] H. J. Geist and E. F. Lambin, “Proximate Causes and Underlying Driving Forces of Tropical Deforestation,” Bioscience, vol. 52, no. 2, p. 143, 2002.
[7] H. Purnomo et al., “Fire economy and actor network of forest and land fires in Indonesia,” For. Policy Econ., vol. 78, pp. 21–31, 2017.
[8] Afrizal, “Final Report: A preliminary assesment of redd governance for Tesso Nilo landscape,” Padang, 2009.
[9] C. P. . Purba et al., Potret Keadaan Indonesia Periode 2009-2013. Bogo: Forest Watch Indonesia, 2014.
[10] A. Mutolib, Yonariza, Mahdi, and H. Ismono, “Gender Inequality and the Oppression of Women within Minangkabau Matrilineal Society: A Case Study of the Management of Ulayat Forest Land in Nagari Bonjol, Dharmasraya District, West Sumatra Province, Indonesia,” Asian women, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 23–49, 2016.
[11] A. Mutolib, Yonariza, Mahdi, and H. Ismono, “Forest ownership conflict between a local community and the state: A case study in Dharmasraya, Indonesia,” J. Trop. For. Sci., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 163–171, 2017.
[12] Afrizal, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Sebuah Upaya Mendukung Penggunaan Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Berbagai Disiplin Ilmu. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada., 2015.
[13] B. Afifuddin and S. Ahmad, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2009.
[14] M. Matthew B, H. A M, and S. Johnny, Qualitative data analysis : a methods sourcebook, Third edit. Thousand Oaks, Califorinia: SAGE Publications, 2014.
[15] R. R. Devkota, A. Maryudi, and M. Krott, “Paradoxes of Community Forestry : Formal Devolution Covering Informal Expansion of State Control – Cases from Nepal and Indonesia,” Geottingen, 2010.
[16] B. D. Ratner, R. Meinzen-Dick, C. May, and E. Haglund, “Resource conflict, collective action, and resilience: An analytical framework,” Int. J. Commons, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 183–208, 2013.
[17] Ministry of Forestry, Operasionalisasi Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan ( KPH ): Langkah Awal Menuju Kemandirian Editor :, 3rd ed. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2014.
[18] F. v. Benda-Beckmann and K. v. Benda-Beckmann, “How communal is communal and whose communal is it? Lesson from Minangkabau.,” in Changing properties of property, Yew York: Berghan Books, 2006, pp. 194–217.
[19] A. Mutolib, Yonariza, H. Ismono, and Mahdi, “Agrarian Conflict and Communal Land Release : A Case Study of Melayu Tribe in Forest Management Unit Dharmasraya, West Sumatra,” J. Penelit. Sos. dan Ekon. Kehutan., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 213–225, 2015.
[20] A. Mutolib, Yonariza, Mahdi, and H. Ismono, “Gender inequality and the oppression of women within minangkabau matrilineal society: A Case study of the management of ulayat forest land in nagari bonjol, dharmasraya district, west sumatra province, Indonesia,” Asian Women, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 23–49, 2016.
[21] Ministry of Forestry, Pembangunan Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan, 1st ed. Jakarta: Pembangunan Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan (KPH): Konsep, Peraturan Perundangan dan Implementasi, 2011.
[22] A. Hamlin, E. Ostrom, R. Gardner, and J. Walter, “Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources.,” Econ. J., vol. 105, no. 431, p. 1034, 1995.
[23] G. Varughese and E. Ostrom, “The contested role of heterogeneity in collective action: Some evidence from community forestry in Nepal,” World Dev., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 747–765, 2001.
[24] C. C. Gibson, M. A. McKean, and E. Ostrom, “Explaining Deforestation: The Role of Local Institutions,” in People and Forests: Communities, Institutions and Governance, C. Gibson, M. A. McKean, and E. Ostrom, Eds. massachusetts: MIT Press, 2000, p. 1–26 (274).
[25] J. C. Ribot and N. L. Peluso, “A Theory of Access*,” Rural Sociol., vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 153–181, 2009.